| Introduction | Contents | Search | Paintings | Essays | Interviews | Shows | Enquiries |
| STUCKIST DEMONSTRATION | |
|
Turner Prize demos: NPG/Tate (2000)
• 2000
• 2001
• 2002 •
2003 •
2004 •
2005 •
2006 -
photos
• 2007
•
2008
- leaflet Other demos: List of Stuckist demos • Trafalgar Square (2001) • White Cube (2002) • Saatchi Gallery (2005) Also on this site: Tate • Serota petition • Stuckist donation • Trustee scandal |
|
| On this page: Turner Prize demo 2008 |
TURNER
PRIZE 2008
|
STUCKIST
TURNER DEMO
"the mediocre standard has almost turned
me into a supporter of the Stuckists" Article on 24hourmuseum
STUCKIST QUOTES
"The Turner Prize is crap"
"The work is not of sufficient quality in accomplishment, innovation
or originality of thought to warrant exhibition in a national museum."
Coxsoft
was there
first (29.9.08)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Stuckist Turner Prize guides Annie Zamero and Elsa Dax. |
![]() Stuckist Turner Prize guides Shelley Li, Edgeworth Johnstone, Jacqueline Jones. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jess Davis, Course Leader of HND/C Graphics at Gloucestershire College emailed, "We visited the Tate Britain yesterday and the topic of your protest caused much discussion amongst our art students on the coach home. We thought you might be interested to know we have decided to hold a debate between groups of students from different disciplines (graphics,photography and fine art) to further discuss the issues. We will let you know the outcome of the debate." | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

|
Download a high res "not wanted" poster as
word doc or jpeg
(500KB).
Turner Prize
nonenties On
not demonstrating against the Turner Prize Tate
censors Stuckist demonstrations Art
Clown of the Year Award 2008 Currently proposed: Martin "vomit" Creed for his stupid Work No 850 (people running in Tate Britain). Sample statement: "running is the opposite of being still." (Actually, being in motion is the "opposite" of being still.) Rachel Campbell-Johnston, art critic of The Times, for her interpretation of Martin "vomit" Creed's stupid Work No 850 (people running). Read it in The Times (scroll down). Sample: "Work No 850 raises myriad possibilities. Is it a simple celebration of vitality? A paean of praise to the human anatomy? A live version of classical statuary? Does Creed want to question the way that we look at art? We presume we should solemnly linger; but here is a fast-mood alternative for our busy modern age. Or maybe the piece is about our Olympic bid?" Or maybe it's about fuck all. Stephen Deuchar, director of Tate Britain for thinking the human figure is "a depiction of the human physique" (same article in The Times as above), for being Sir Nicholas Serota wearing a Groucho Marx moustache, and for chairing a Turner Prize jury which has selected exceptional lameness. Antony Gormley for saying: “Through elevation onto the plinth and removal from common ground, the body becomes a metaphor, a symbol and allows us to reflect on the diversity, vulnerability and particularity of the individual in contemporary society.” This is another way of saying he will place volunteers on a plinth in Trafalgar Square. What metaphor?, symbolic of what? The reality is that the same diversity, vulnerability and particularity can be found at a bus stop, train station or any other place occupied by the general public, which people are more likely to be aware of in every day life rather than the artificiality and contrivance of Gormley’s “art“ “work“. More info: www.antonygormley.com. Proposed by Andrew Galbraith. |
|||||||||||||